Shouldn't there be a legal finding that indecisiveness renders a presidential candidate dangerous to others?

Perhaps, we could have Hillary locked up until after the election - for the public good.Shouldn't there be a legal finding that indecisiveness renders a presidential candidate dangerous to others?
Why would you ever let her out?


She should be sent too club gitmo but it would not faze her to have to miss her prayer time like the others. But it would be torture for her to have to read the Constitution and the Bible.Shouldn't there be a legal finding that indecisiveness renders a presidential candidate dangerous to others?
Yeah, it should be called the ';My Pet Goat'; rule.
She is just trying to be like her hero Kerry,she needs to be for things,before she's against them. In her case sometimes in the course of two minutes,as she showed in the debate. The woman melted down on stage on national television.





By the end of the debate,the only thing anyone knew was that she didn't know whether she supported licences for illegals or not. The only thing anyone learned was that she has no true core principles,she just tells people want to hear at any given moment.





AD
We need leadership in the White House not followship. She is worse than Kerry when standing by her decisions. You are right in that she should not be trusted.
If that were the case, then george w bush would never see the light of day again in this lifetime.
If she can't handle a debate when the pressure is on, what will she do during a real crisis? Cry for mama and go home? It was a pathetic spectacle to see her change her positions at the blink of an eye during the recent debate. And unlike the MSM her opponents on stage with her didn't give her a free pass on it either. Now she's whining that the debate was unfair and that these meanies were ganging up on her. So, not only is she a waffling flip-flopper but thin-skinned as well.