1, open 3dsmax
2, f10
3, By Default the selection will be Single
4, Please change that to Active Time Segment
5, If you need certain limited are to render please select Range
Friday, January 8, 2010
How do I render an animation with 3d max?
I know how to render a still scene but not an animation.How do I render an animation with 3d max?
1, open 3dsmax
2, f10
3, By Default the selection will be Single
4, Please change that to Active Time Segment
5, If you need certain limited are to render please select Rangenumbering cortisone cream
1, open 3dsmax
2, f10
3, By Default the selection will be Single
4, Please change that to Active Time Segment
5, If you need certain limited are to render please select Range
How do I render the best quality video with video editing software?
When I render video onto a DVD, the effects and video quality don't come out as crisp as on the computer. What types of things can I do to make the rendering process more efficient? Is it the type of video card, the processor, the software, etc..? I am currently running a pentium D processor, w/ 256 mb geforce 6800, with 2GB memory, and a 250 gig hard drive. I currently use Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0. I am going to buy a new computer though, and I want to know which components would be most helpful in future. Any help would be great. Thank you.How do I render the best quality video with video editing software?
Most output quality loss will depend on the input video file quality /capture quality.
The video card / ram etc on your PC will NOT affect the rendering quality as this is purely an internal process, so more ram etc makes the job quicker.
Personally I use Movie Edit pro (V 12) and find that all the effects are crisp and clear. It's also a whole lot cheaper than Premiere.
What you ';NEED'; for efficientr editing.
Lots of RAM, and a fast processor
2 HDDs for data storage. 1 for source material and 1 for the output. For large files this can make a noticable difference, and NOT external ones.
If you work comining large files a 3rd drive (seperate physical drive, not just a partition) can make this quicker still.
Most output quality loss will depend on the input video file quality /capture quality.
The video card / ram etc on your PC will NOT affect the rendering quality as this is purely an internal process, so more ram etc makes the job quicker.
Personally I use Movie Edit pro (V 12) and find that all the effects are crisp and clear. It's also a whole lot cheaper than Premiere.
What you ';NEED'; for efficientr editing.
Lots of RAM, and a fast processor
2 HDDs for data storage. 1 for source material and 1 for the output. For large files this can make a noticable difference, and NOT external ones.
If you work comining large files a 3rd drive (seperate physical drive, not just a partition) can make this quicker still.
How can you render a cell phone useless?
It has to be permanent, and discreet (I don't want it to look like a hammer was taken to it.)How can you render a cell phone useless?
Drop it in a glass of water after you have removed the battery. Take the antenna(if there is one) and scratch it up nicely. Then go to where the battery was and try to see if anything can get pulled loose.
Enjoy!How can you render a cell phone useless?
Take out the battery and grab a small pointy thing (safety pin) and mess around with the cables and stuff, also drop some water down there. *mock surprise* OOPSIES why is my phone all screwed up? O.O
The best way is to reprogram it...water can be seen because they have water marks on the phone that show if there has been water damage...call a cell phone carrier and tell them you want to put a new phone on your service...they will give you the codes to reprogram your phone and walk you through it...you just pretend like you are doing but really just write down the codes and ';accidently'; hang up when you get the codes...it should be something like #12345*# the numbers in the middle will be different but once they give you the code, it enters you into the cell programming area, then you just take out the phone number and put in a bogus one...the phone will never ring again until you change it back!!! Good luck!
Drop it in the toilet. leave it on. watch the disco lights and call it a day.
put it into water for a while
remove battery and with some tweezers pull out ofne of the litle bits where the battery element bits connect.........
naughty person
EDIT
he will just get another phone... kick his *** in, and hers if she knows about you..........
get into his phone change her number to the local police station see what happens if he sends her dirty msg's
hehe
Drop it in a glass of water after you have removed the battery. Take the antenna(if there is one) and scratch it up nicely. Then go to where the battery was and try to see if anything can get pulled loose.
Enjoy!How can you render a cell phone useless?
Take out the battery and grab a small pointy thing (safety pin) and mess around with the cables and stuff, also drop some water down there. *mock surprise* OOPSIES why is my phone all screwed up? O.O
The best way is to reprogram it...water can be seen because they have water marks on the phone that show if there has been water damage...call a cell phone carrier and tell them you want to put a new phone on your service...they will give you the codes to reprogram your phone and walk you through it...you just pretend like you are doing but really just write down the codes and ';accidently'; hang up when you get the codes...it should be something like #12345*# the numbers in the middle will be different but once they give you the code, it enters you into the cell programming area, then you just take out the phone number and put in a bogus one...the phone will never ring again until you change it back!!! Good luck!
Drop it in the toilet. leave it on. watch the disco lights and call it a day.
put it into water for a while
remove battery and with some tweezers pull out ofne of the litle bits where the battery element bits connect.........
naughty person
EDIT
he will just get another phone... kick his *** in, and hers if she knows about you..........
get into his phone change her number to the local police station see what happens if he sends her dirty msg's
hehe
To render or not to render a house?
I am looking at redering my new two story brick home. How much will this approx cost to have the front done? Also, will this add much value on for resale?To render or not to render a house?
That depends upon several things. Who is doing the work? How much work is to be done? My grandfather used a set of blue prints once because the insurance company required it. He knew everything about what he was doing and didn't need the blue prints. Houses aren't that simple anymore, but some of the work is that simple.To render or not to render a house?
Check with Home Depot for an estimate - and it may cost $100 for such an estimate, but well worth it as they can find any hidden repairs that you won't consider.
GOD bless.
Too many question left without answers to be able to help. A lease does help with the bank,yet I need more info. Feel free to email me. I have been a landlord for years.
That depends upon several things. Who is doing the work? How much work is to be done? My grandfather used a set of blue prints once because the insurance company required it. He knew everything about what he was doing and didn't need the blue prints. Houses aren't that simple anymore, but some of the work is that simple.To render or not to render a house?
Check with Home Depot for an estimate - and it may cost $100 for such an estimate, but well worth it as they can find any hidden repairs that you won't consider.
GOD bless.
Too many question left without answers to be able to help. A lease does help with the bank,yet I need more info. Feel free to email me. I have been a landlord for years.
What chemicals compound or element can be added to render urine odourless?
I wish to undertake a sanitary project where urine can be converted to water and other compunds in portable gadgets.What chemicals compound or element can be added to render urine odourless?
chlorophyllin /chlo路ro路phyl路lin/ (klor麓o-fil-in) any of the water-soluble salts from chlorophyll; used topically and orally for deodorizing skin lesions and orally for deodorizing the urine and feces in colostomy, ileostomy, and incontinence; used particularly in the form of the copper complex.
I heard about this product a long time ago... still around so it probably works... Called body Mint... you might be able to figure out what chemicals this product works with.
http://www.livingiseasy.co.uk/products/c鈥?/a>What chemicals compound or element can be added to render urine odourless?
i think urine and iodine aren't friends (I can't remember). Bleach also possibly.
Run it through a carbon filter, but you need to do more than remove the odor to make it water.
enzymes baby, enzymes
more than likely water.
chlorophyllin /chlo路ro路phyl路lin/ (klor麓o-fil-in) any of the water-soluble salts from chlorophyll; used topically and orally for deodorizing skin lesions and orally for deodorizing the urine and feces in colostomy, ileostomy, and incontinence; used particularly in the form of the copper complex.
I heard about this product a long time ago... still around so it probably works... Called body Mint... you might be able to figure out what chemicals this product works with.
http://www.livingiseasy.co.uk/products/c鈥?/a>What chemicals compound or element can be added to render urine odourless?
i think urine and iodine aren't friends (I can't remember). Bleach also possibly.
Run it through a carbon filter, but you need to do more than remove the odor to make it water.
enzymes baby, enzymes
more than likely water.
Where can I purchase a voice scrambler to render a listening device unintelligible feedback?
I simply want an invasion of privacy to be stopped. Where can I purchase a voice scrambler to render a listening device unintelligible feedback?
Hello
get on this page
You wanted the information!
http://www.shopwildplanet.com/prod/WPT70鈥?/a>
Hope I could help.
Hello
get on this page
You wanted the information!
http://www.shopwildplanet.com/prod/WPT70鈥?/a>
Hope I could help.
When I render as on sony vegas It only saves the first 10 seconds?
For some reason when I press file%26gt;render as on sony vegas it only saves the first 10 seconds? Whats the deal?When I render as on sony vegas It only saves the first 10 seconds?
be sure you have the entire clip selected before you render.
and also make sure all the clips in the file are set at 30fpsWhen I render as on sony vegas It only saves the first 10 seconds?
Do you have a loop region highlighted, and the 'render loop region only' box ticked in the render dialog?numbering cortisone cream
be sure you have the entire clip selected before you render.
and also make sure all the clips in the file are set at 30fpsWhen I render as on sony vegas It only saves the first 10 seconds?
Do you have a loop region highlighted, and the 'render loop region only' box ticked in the render dialog?
How is the core duo chip at 3d rendering?
I remember a friend telling me that you could render at real time with a high-end g4 mac. Now that macs are moved on to core-duo chips, I wanted to know if they can do the same/better/worst for 3d rendering?How is the core duo chip at 3d rendering?
most 3d rendering is done by the video card not the processor, but yes the duel cores are better at all tasks even single threaded ones because the other tasks that the OS dose in the background can be switched to the second coreHow is the core duo chip at 3d rendering?
I dislike when people give answers like this before doing their own research.... it just confuses everybody. The only ';rendering'; your video card does, is the real-time rendering of what you are seeing on your viewport in terms of polygons, materials, lights, etc... CPU is your RENDERING power Report Abuse
most 3d rendering is done by the video card not the processor, but yes the duel cores are better at all tasks even single threaded ones because the other tasks that the OS dose in the background can be switched to the second coreHow is the core duo chip at 3d rendering?
I dislike when people give answers like this before doing their own research.... it just confuses everybody. The only ';rendering'; your video card does, is the real-time rendering of what you are seeing on your viewport in terms of polygons, materials, lights, etc... CPU is your RENDERING power Report Abuse
What a small claims judgement is rendered is there a time frame you have to wait before garnishing wages?
I know when I win in small claims court the defendant will not pay.
He has a good job, and I was wondering if I could start the process of collections immediately after the judgment or is there a waiting period that muse satisfied?
I'm in NJ, and ideally after the judgment I would like to start the collections process as fast as possible, is there a time frame i have to wait before I start this process?What a small claims judgement is rendered is there a time frame you have to wait before garnishing wages?
You have to go back to the clerk at the small claims court, and have the court file for non-payment. The clerk can explain the options to you.
they are also listed here.
http://books.google.com/books?id=fYPGn13鈥?/a>What a small claims judgement is rendered is there a time frame you have to wait before garnishing wages?
I am not sure you can do it but it is worth a try
I remember a small claims I won years ago indicated I had 10 yrs to collect
He has a good job, and I was wondering if I could start the process of collections immediately after the judgment or is there a waiting period that muse satisfied?
I'm in NJ, and ideally after the judgment I would like to start the collections process as fast as possible, is there a time frame i have to wait before I start this process?What a small claims judgement is rendered is there a time frame you have to wait before garnishing wages?
You have to go back to the clerk at the small claims court, and have the court file for non-payment. The clerk can explain the options to you.
they are also listed here.
http://books.google.com/books?id=fYPGn13鈥?/a>What a small claims judgement is rendered is there a time frame you have to wait before garnishing wages?
I am not sure you can do it but it is worth a try
I remember a small claims I won years ago indicated I had 10 yrs to collect
What's the difference between rendering and rasterization?
Both seem to convert a model into pixels.What's the difference between rendering and rasterization?
When you rasterize an image, you are converting it from a vector-based format to a pixel-based format. Rendering would probably be more commonly used when it refers to ';generating'; something, such as rendering a video to MPEG-2 format after you have performed editing such as transitions or cutting out scenes.What's the difference between rendering and rasterization?
Rasterization or rasterisation is the task of taking an image described in a vector graphics format (shapes) and converting it into a raster image (pixels or dots) for output on a video display or printer, or for storage in a bitmap file format.
The term rasterization can in general be applied to any process by which vector information can be converted into a raster format.
In normal usage, the term refers to the popular rendering algorithm for displaying three-dimensional shapes on a computer. Rasterization is currently the most popular technique for producing real-time 3D computer graphics. Real-time applications need to respond immediately to user input, and generally need to produce frame rates of at least 20 frames per second (and preferably 60 fps or more).
Compared with other rendering techniques such as ray tracing, rasterization is extremely fast. However, rasterization is simply the process of computing the mapping from scene geometry to pixels and does not prescribe a particular way to compute the color of those pixels. Shading, including programmable shading, may be based on physical light transport, or artistic intent.
HTH
When you rasterize an image, you are converting it from a vector-based format to a pixel-based format. Rendering would probably be more commonly used when it refers to ';generating'; something, such as rendering a video to MPEG-2 format after you have performed editing such as transitions or cutting out scenes.What's the difference between rendering and rasterization?
Rasterization or rasterisation is the task of taking an image described in a vector graphics format (shapes) and converting it into a raster image (pixels or dots) for output on a video display or printer, or for storage in a bitmap file format.
The term rasterization can in general be applied to any process by which vector information can be converted into a raster format.
In normal usage, the term refers to the popular rendering algorithm for displaying three-dimensional shapes on a computer. Rasterization is currently the most popular technique for producing real-time 3D computer graphics. Real-time applications need to respond immediately to user input, and generally need to produce frame rates of at least 20 frames per second (and preferably 60 fps or more).
Compared with other rendering techniques such as ray tracing, rasterization is extremely fast. However, rasterization is simply the process of computing the mapping from scene geometry to pixels and does not prescribe a particular way to compute the color of those pixels. Shading, including programmable shading, may be based on physical light transport, or artistic intent.
HTH
What is it about iron chariots that renders God impotent?
';And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron. (Judges 1:19)';
I mean, the tensile strength of Iron is horrible. Steel chariots, on the other hand...What is it about iron chariots that renders God impotent?
iron is to god as kryptonite is to superman.What is it about iron chariots that renders God impotent?
the lord did not take on the iron chariots he sent Judah to do the job. when Judah went in his own strength with his own army and his own inadequate weapons Judah was defeated. read on a bit any you find out the inhabitants of the Vally were finally usurped with gods help. tmm
In folklore iron has always been the achilles heel of evil.
I mean, the tensile strength of Iron is horrible. Steel chariots, on the other hand...What is it about iron chariots that renders God impotent?
iron is to god as kryptonite is to superman.What is it about iron chariots that renders God impotent?
the lord did not take on the iron chariots he sent Judah to do the job. when Judah went in his own strength with his own army and his own inadequate weapons Judah was defeated. read on a bit any you find out the inhabitants of the Vally were finally usurped with gods help. tmm
In folklore iron has always been the achilles heel of evil.
How do I make and render an object in AutoCAD when the components are not in the same plane?
I am trying to render a ship's hull, which has lots of curves and is not in a single plane. AutoCAD will not allow me to make this ship an object, or sections of this ship an object, because the components are not co-planar. Any suggestions?How do I make and render an object in AutoCAD when the components are not in the same plane?
Obviously since you are designing a 3D object not everything can be placed on ';0'; on the Z axis or else your boat would be flat. That being said, how did you design this ship? Are these components AutoCAD Solids? If so you shouldn't have a problem, it should simply render. If you want this to be one ';piece'; or object you could simply insert it into a new drawing as a block and it's automatically an object (block). BUT if these are not solids then I'm curious about how you designed this?
Try posting your question on AUGI (www.augi.com) where they have hundreds of AutoCAD experts and you can post the file on their forums. They are currently working on their forum this week-end, but they should running again Monday morning.How do I make and render an object in AutoCAD when the components are not in the same plane?
You can try to put all objects at zero elevation ('z'). Problems like this are usually caused by objects having 'z' values other than zero. Unless you are building a 3d model it is best to have all objects with a 'z' value of zero. Just having a lot of curves should not cause you much trouble unless you are working with 3d objects if you set the 'Center Z' value to zero with in your properties menu.
Obviously since you are designing a 3D object not everything can be placed on ';0'; on the Z axis or else your boat would be flat. That being said, how did you design this ship? Are these components AutoCAD Solids? If so you shouldn't have a problem, it should simply render. If you want this to be one ';piece'; or object you could simply insert it into a new drawing as a block and it's automatically an object (block). BUT if these are not solids then I'm curious about how you designed this?
Try posting your question on AUGI (www.augi.com) where they have hundreds of AutoCAD experts and you can post the file on their forums. They are currently working on their forum this week-end, but they should running again Monday morning.How do I make and render an object in AutoCAD when the components are not in the same plane?
You can try to put all objects at zero elevation ('z'). Problems like this are usually caused by objects having 'z' values other than zero. Unless you are building a 3d model it is best to have all objects with a 'z' value of zero. Just having a lot of curves should not cause you much trouble unless you are working with 3d objects if you set the 'Center Z' value to zero with in your properties menu.
How do i apply a render to one side of an external wall?
Not sure of the correct wording, but i need to apply a render to one side of an external wall. How do i prepare the wall before applying the render? Do i need to fix batons first?How do i apply a render to one side of an external wall?
I believe they are called rendered laths - used for plaster work. Here's a web site to get you going.
http://www.oldhousestore.co.uk/tech_ohs/鈥?/a>How do i apply a render to one side of an external wall?
mix up some mortar. cement, sand, water. lie on the grass and throw lumps of the mix at the wall. watch it slide and drop. Improve your aim and cover it partially while your misses cake you in cement, that dries while you work. you should now be encased in your self made prison. Enjoy. look at the sky, its starting to rain, now soil yourself, should not have had that third cup of nescafe. a spider crawls into your mouth and hungrily you devour it. oh the refreshing lifegiving rain. drink it all in. Nightfall comes and you are cold. you realise a dog has lifted its leg and urinated on you, You cry, you pray, you swear, but alas, this is the fate of the novice wall renderer.numbering cortisone cream
I believe they are called rendered laths - used for plaster work. Here's a web site to get you going.
http://www.oldhousestore.co.uk/tech_ohs/鈥?/a>How do i apply a render to one side of an external wall?
mix up some mortar. cement, sand, water. lie on the grass and throw lumps of the mix at the wall. watch it slide and drop. Improve your aim and cover it partially while your misses cake you in cement, that dries while you work. you should now be encased in your self made prison. Enjoy. look at the sky, its starting to rain, now soil yourself, should not have had that third cup of nescafe. a spider crawls into your mouth and hungrily you devour it. oh the refreshing lifegiving rain. drink it all in. Nightfall comes and you are cold. you realise a dog has lifted its leg and urinated on you, You cry, you pray, you swear, but alas, this is the fate of the novice wall renderer.
Does changing the render quality in sony vegas before you render decrease your video quality?
I have sony vegas platinum. I found that if you go to the video qualities and make the render quality worse that editing is much smoother. Can I make the render quality ';draft';, edit my video, then change the render quality back to best before I render without losing quality?Does changing the render quality in sony vegas before you render decrease your video quality?
Nope. All that you're doing is changing the quality of the preview. It doesn't apply that setting to the actual render. The options in the ';Render as...'; dialogue box over-ride everything else.
Generally, having the preview quality set as ';preview - auto'; will allow for the smoothest editing playback. You can turn it down to ';draft';, but it's not terribly good. Having the preview quality set with ';auto'; will allow Vegas to change resolution during the preview if it can't keep up. Don't forget that certain sections where you apply complex effects can be temporarily rendered by using ';selective pre-rendering'; or ';dynamic ram preview'; (look up those terms in the help file for more details if you need to).
Nope. All that you're doing is changing the quality of the preview. It doesn't apply that setting to the actual render. The options in the ';Render as...'; dialogue box over-ride everything else.
Generally, having the preview quality set as ';preview - auto'; will allow for the smoothest editing playback. You can turn it down to ';draft';, but it's not terribly good. Having the preview quality set with ';auto'; will allow Vegas to change resolution during the preview if it can't keep up. Don't forget that certain sections where you apply complex effects can be temporarily rendered by using ';selective pre-rendering'; or ';dynamic ram preview'; (look up those terms in the help file for more details if you need to).
How do you remove spray paint from white render?
render is what is commonly used on the outside of buildings. Its like little white, sharp chips, sometimes in shell form.How do you remove spray paint from white render?
Try paint thinner.But be careful.Try just a little corner first to check for discoloration.Oh, and use a white towel so the color of the towel doesn't make it worse.
Try paint thinner.But be careful.Try just a little corner first to check for discoloration.Oh, and use a white towel so the color of the towel doesn't make it worse.
What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
Anyways, we're having a debate in history class about requiring citizens of a country to render service to the government for at least a year. Unfortunately though, I am in the negative side and I have to think about arguments as to why service to the government is not required. Any ideas?What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
I'm just going to throw all my thoughts out here. You can sort through and find which ones resonate with you.
Several countries require formalized service from their citizens. Historically, just about every country has had a draft at one point or another. Jury duty could also be considered a required service to your country. Some societies have required military service as a prerequisite for citizenship.
Some arguments against required service could include that it is often not applied evenly (there are notorious loop holes that rich people have used to keep their kids from serving in the military, or at least to keep them from serving in combat. It can force people to provide services they don't feel are ethical.
It is often proposed for young people, and has, in the past been used to require military service from people who are not yet old enough to vote, thereby disenfranchising them. (That's actually why we lowered the U.S. voting age.)
You can argue that unless you have voluntarily entered into an agreement for service you are being forced into an involuntary contract. You can argue that, because it is not voluntary it is therefore a form of slavery.
Most of the arguments for service are going to be wrapped up in some form of patriotism or an idea that it is good for a person to do service for others. You can argue that it's a form of communism.
More practically, how do you administer such a program fairly? What about someone who is too disabled to provide service? Are they exempt? Do they still get to vote?
You can argue that if a country wants the service of it's citizens it should compensate it's citizens well enough so that they want to provide the service voluntarily, and that without a cost attached to it the government will use that resource (free labor) poorly.
You can argue that in most situations of forced service the institution in charge of directing that labor is in a position to indoctrinate people to support more forced service.
If you are talking about a short term of service (max. a couple of years) are the people going to become expert enough to do the job well? Do you really want to require the dumbest kid in the class to do something important for your country for a couple of years? Wouldn't you get better results if you paid the smartest kid in the class to work for the government for a long time and get really good at it? Is someone who is just there because they are required to be there going to work as hard as someone who is competing for a good paying job?What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
Just as it would be morally wrong for me to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for me for a year, it is likewise wrong for a government to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for it for a year.
There is no logical reason why the same action is immoral when committed by an individual but somehow moral when committed by the government.
';But the government provides services, and therefore has a right to demand something in return,'; some will no doubt argue. But what if an individual provided those same services? Would that individual then have the right to enslave you for a year? What if you did not want those services, or need those services, and what if you did not ask for those services? There can be no obligation to repay a debt that you did not voluntarily incur. It is for this same reason that taxation is immoral.
';That government is best which governs least,'; said Thoreau. If a government is large enough and busy enough to require a year of service from each of its citizens, it is doing more than it ought to be doing. Downsize centralized government, and let individuals govern themselves to the maximum extent possible.
In our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson listed among his complaints against the King of England the involuntary servitude that many colonists had been subjected to under English rule. Would we give up our American ideals so easily, and slip back into the tyranny that we fought against in the American Revolution? I hope not.
Look at the Constitution (13th amendment): no involuntary servitude.
Here's some examples of countries that require ';service'; to the government: Soviet Union. Nazi Germany. N. Korea. Cuba.
In other words--government is supposed to be the servant of the people, not the master. Anyone who advocates mandatory service to the government is advocating slavery and dictatorship. Period.
I can't think of a single reason why a country would NOT want to require that of its citizens.
I believe that Israel, Switzerland, and Germany all require citizen service.
Great post, I am going to lurk and watch what comments are posted
I'm just going to throw all my thoughts out here. You can sort through and find which ones resonate with you.
Several countries require formalized service from their citizens. Historically, just about every country has had a draft at one point or another. Jury duty could also be considered a required service to your country. Some societies have required military service as a prerequisite for citizenship.
Some arguments against required service could include that it is often not applied evenly (there are notorious loop holes that rich people have used to keep their kids from serving in the military, or at least to keep them from serving in combat. It can force people to provide services they don't feel are ethical.
It is often proposed for young people, and has, in the past been used to require military service from people who are not yet old enough to vote, thereby disenfranchising them. (That's actually why we lowered the U.S. voting age.)
You can argue that unless you have voluntarily entered into an agreement for service you are being forced into an involuntary contract. You can argue that, because it is not voluntary it is therefore a form of slavery.
Most of the arguments for service are going to be wrapped up in some form of patriotism or an idea that it is good for a person to do service for others. You can argue that it's a form of communism.
More practically, how do you administer such a program fairly? What about someone who is too disabled to provide service? Are they exempt? Do they still get to vote?
You can argue that if a country wants the service of it's citizens it should compensate it's citizens well enough so that they want to provide the service voluntarily, and that without a cost attached to it the government will use that resource (free labor) poorly.
You can argue that in most situations of forced service the institution in charge of directing that labor is in a position to indoctrinate people to support more forced service.
If you are talking about a short term of service (max. a couple of years) are the people going to become expert enough to do the job well? Do you really want to require the dumbest kid in the class to do something important for your country for a couple of years? Wouldn't you get better results if you paid the smartest kid in the class to work for the government for a long time and get really good at it? Is someone who is just there because they are required to be there going to work as hard as someone who is competing for a good paying job?What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
Just as it would be morally wrong for me to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for me for a year, it is likewise wrong for a government to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for it for a year.
There is no logical reason why the same action is immoral when committed by an individual but somehow moral when committed by the government.
';But the government provides services, and therefore has a right to demand something in return,'; some will no doubt argue. But what if an individual provided those same services? Would that individual then have the right to enslave you for a year? What if you did not want those services, or need those services, and what if you did not ask for those services? There can be no obligation to repay a debt that you did not voluntarily incur. It is for this same reason that taxation is immoral.
';That government is best which governs least,'; said Thoreau. If a government is large enough and busy enough to require a year of service from each of its citizens, it is doing more than it ought to be doing. Downsize centralized government, and let individuals govern themselves to the maximum extent possible.
In our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson listed among his complaints against the King of England the involuntary servitude that many colonists had been subjected to under English rule. Would we give up our American ideals so easily, and slip back into the tyranny that we fought against in the American Revolution? I hope not.
Look at the Constitution (13th amendment): no involuntary servitude.
Here's some examples of countries that require ';service'; to the government: Soviet Union. Nazi Germany. N. Korea. Cuba.
In other words--government is supposed to be the servant of the people, not the master. Anyone who advocates mandatory service to the government is advocating slavery and dictatorship. Period.
I can't think of a single reason why a country would NOT want to require that of its citizens.
I believe that Israel, Switzerland, and Germany all require citizen service.
Great post, I am going to lurk and watch what comments are posted
How do I to render a painted brick wall?
After reseaching I discover that render will not stick to paint. In my lounge I have a 7'x4' internal old brick chimney, with very rough brick that has been painted white. Its so 70's and ugly.The paint is in very good condidtion, not a speck of brick to be seen, so removal of the paint isnt an option.(also impossible) I want to render it. Can anyone suggest a way how, or perhaps any other idea, but i dont want painted bricks
Thanks in advanceHow do I to render a painted brick wall?
Couldn't you wrap it with the wire mesh they put on a house foundation before putting architectual stone up then put your plaster or lath on that?
Good luck!
Thanks in advanceHow do I to render a painted brick wall?
Couldn't you wrap it with the wire mesh they put on a house foundation before putting architectual stone up then put your plaster or lath on that?
Good luck!
Graphics cards. What's the difference between parallel rendering and dual rendering pipelines?
Would I want 4 parallel rendering pipelines or two dual rendering ones?Graphics cards. What's the difference between parallel rendering and dual rendering pipelines?
read all about it below - as to your 2nd question, it would help to know just what you are trying to do.
read all about it below - as to your 2nd question, it would help to know just what you are trying to do.
Does changing the render quality in sony vegas before you render decrease your video quality?
I have sony vegas platinum. I found that if you go to the video qualities and make the render quality worse that editing is much smoother. Can I make the render quality ';draft';, edit my video, then change the render quality back to best before I render without losing quality?Does changing the render quality in sony vegas before you render decrease your video quality?
Nope. All that you're doing is changing the quality of the preview. It doesn't apply that setting to the actual render. The options in the ';Render as...'; dialogue box over-ride everything else.
Generally, having the preview quality set as ';preview - auto'; will allow for the smoothest editing playback. You can turn it down to ';draft';, but it's not terribly good. Having the preview quality set with ';auto'; will allow Vegas to change resolution during the preview if it can't keep up. Don't forget that certain sections where you apply complex effects can be temporarily rendered by using ';selective pre-rendering'; or ';dynamic ram preview'; (look up those terms in the help file for more details if you need to).numbering cortisone cream
Nope. All that you're doing is changing the quality of the preview. It doesn't apply that setting to the actual render. The options in the ';Render as...'; dialogue box over-ride everything else.
Generally, having the preview quality set as ';preview - auto'; will allow for the smoothest editing playback. You can turn it down to ';draft';, but it's not terribly good. Having the preview quality set with ';auto'; will allow Vegas to change resolution during the preview if it can't keep up. Don't forget that certain sections where you apply complex effects can be temporarily rendered by using ';selective pre-rendering'; or ';dynamic ram preview'; (look up those terms in the help file for more details if you need to).
How do you remove spray paint from white render?
render is what is commonly used on the outside of buildings. Its like little white, sharp chips, sometimes in shell form.How do you remove spray paint from white render?
Try paint thinner.But be careful.Try just a little corner first to check for discoloration.Oh, and use a white towel so the color of the towel doesn't make it worse.
Try paint thinner.But be careful.Try just a little corner first to check for discoloration.Oh, and use a white towel so the color of the towel doesn't make it worse.
What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
Anyways, we're having a debate in history class about requiring citizens of a country to render service to the government for at least a year. Unfortunately though, I am in the negative side and I have to think about arguments as to why service to the government is not required. Any ideas?What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
I'm just going to throw all my thoughts out here. You can sort through and find which ones resonate with you.
Several countries require formalized service from their citizens. Historically, just about every country has had a draft at one point or another. Jury duty could also be considered a required service to your country. Some societies have required military service as a prerequisite for citizenship.
Some arguments against required service could include that it is often not applied evenly (there are notorious loop holes that rich people have used to keep their kids from serving in the military, or at least to keep them from serving in combat. It can force people to provide services they don't feel are ethical.
It is often proposed for young people, and has, in the past been used to require military service from people who are not yet old enough to vote, thereby disenfranchising them. (That's actually why we lowered the U.S. voting age.)
You can argue that unless you have voluntarily entered into an agreement for service you are being forced into an involuntary contract. You can argue that, because it is not voluntary it is therefore a form of slavery.
Most of the arguments for service are going to be wrapped up in some form of patriotism or an idea that it is good for a person to do service for others. You can argue that it's a form of communism.
More practically, how do you administer such a program fairly? What about someone who is too disabled to provide service? Are they exempt? Do they still get to vote?
You can argue that if a country wants the service of it's citizens it should compensate it's citizens well enough so that they want to provide the service voluntarily, and that without a cost attached to it the government will use that resource (free labor) poorly.
You can argue that in most situations of forced service the institution in charge of directing that labor is in a position to indoctrinate people to support more forced service.
If you are talking about a short term of service (max. a couple of years) are the people going to become expert enough to do the job well? Do you really want to require the dumbest kid in the class to do something important for your country for a couple of years? Wouldn't you get better results if you paid the smartest kid in the class to work for the government for a long time and get really good at it? Is someone who is just there because they are required to be there going to work as hard as someone who is competing for a good paying job?What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
Just as it would be morally wrong for me to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for me for a year, it is likewise wrong for a government to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for it for a year.
There is no logical reason why the same action is immoral when committed by an individual but somehow moral when committed by the government.
';But the government provides services, and therefore has a right to demand something in return,'; some will no doubt argue. But what if an individual provided those same services? Would that individual then have the right to enslave you for a year? What if you did not want those services, or need those services, and what if you did not ask for those services? There can be no obligation to repay a debt that you did not voluntarily incur. It is for this same reason that taxation is immoral.
';That government is best which governs least,'; said Thoreau. If a government is large enough and busy enough to require a year of service from each of its citizens, it is doing more than it ought to be doing. Downsize centralized government, and let individuals govern themselves to the maximum extent possible.
In our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson listed among his complaints against the King of England the involuntary servitude that many colonists had been subjected to under English rule. Would we give up our American ideals so easily, and slip back into the tyranny that we fought against in the American Revolution? I hope not.
Look at the Constitution (13th amendment): no involuntary servitude.
Here's some examples of countries that require ';service'; to the government: Soviet Union. Nazi Germany. N. Korea. Cuba.
In other words--government is supposed to be the servant of the people, not the master. Anyone who advocates mandatory service to the government is advocating slavery and dictatorship. Period.
I can't think of a single reason why a country would NOT want to require that of its citizens.
I believe that Israel, Switzerland, and Germany all require citizen service.
Great post, I am going to lurk and watch what comments are posted
I'm just going to throw all my thoughts out here. You can sort through and find which ones resonate with you.
Several countries require formalized service from their citizens. Historically, just about every country has had a draft at one point or another. Jury duty could also be considered a required service to your country. Some societies have required military service as a prerequisite for citizenship.
Some arguments against required service could include that it is often not applied evenly (there are notorious loop holes that rich people have used to keep their kids from serving in the military, or at least to keep them from serving in combat. It can force people to provide services they don't feel are ethical.
It is often proposed for young people, and has, in the past been used to require military service from people who are not yet old enough to vote, thereby disenfranchising them. (That's actually why we lowered the U.S. voting age.)
You can argue that unless you have voluntarily entered into an agreement for service you are being forced into an involuntary contract. You can argue that, because it is not voluntary it is therefore a form of slavery.
Most of the arguments for service are going to be wrapped up in some form of patriotism or an idea that it is good for a person to do service for others. You can argue that it's a form of communism.
More practically, how do you administer such a program fairly? What about someone who is too disabled to provide service? Are they exempt? Do they still get to vote?
You can argue that if a country wants the service of it's citizens it should compensate it's citizens well enough so that they want to provide the service voluntarily, and that without a cost attached to it the government will use that resource (free labor) poorly.
You can argue that in most situations of forced service the institution in charge of directing that labor is in a position to indoctrinate people to support more forced service.
If you are talking about a short term of service (max. a couple of years) are the people going to become expert enough to do the job well? Do you really want to require the dumbest kid in the class to do something important for your country for a couple of years? Wouldn't you get better results if you paid the smartest kid in the class to work for the government for a long time and get really good at it? Is someone who is just there because they are required to be there going to work as hard as someone who is competing for a good paying job?What are examples of countries that require its citizens to render service to the government?
Just as it would be morally wrong for me to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for me for a year, it is likewise wrong for a government to force you, more or less at gunpoint, to work for it for a year.
There is no logical reason why the same action is immoral when committed by an individual but somehow moral when committed by the government.
';But the government provides services, and therefore has a right to demand something in return,'; some will no doubt argue. But what if an individual provided those same services? Would that individual then have the right to enslave you for a year? What if you did not want those services, or need those services, and what if you did not ask for those services? There can be no obligation to repay a debt that you did not voluntarily incur. It is for this same reason that taxation is immoral.
';That government is best which governs least,'; said Thoreau. If a government is large enough and busy enough to require a year of service from each of its citizens, it is doing more than it ought to be doing. Downsize centralized government, and let individuals govern themselves to the maximum extent possible.
In our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson listed among his complaints against the King of England the involuntary servitude that many colonists had been subjected to under English rule. Would we give up our American ideals so easily, and slip back into the tyranny that we fought against in the American Revolution? I hope not.
Look at the Constitution (13th amendment): no involuntary servitude.
Here's some examples of countries that require ';service'; to the government: Soviet Union. Nazi Germany. N. Korea. Cuba.
In other words--government is supposed to be the servant of the people, not the master. Anyone who advocates mandatory service to the government is advocating slavery and dictatorship. Period.
I can't think of a single reason why a country would NOT want to require that of its citizens.
I believe that Israel, Switzerland, and Germany all require citizen service.
Great post, I am going to lurk and watch what comments are posted
How do I to render a painted brick wall?
After reseaching I discover that render will not stick to paint. In my lounge I have a 7'x4' internal old brick chimney, with very rough brick that has been painted white. Its so 70's and ugly.The paint is in very good condidtion, not a speck of brick to be seen, so removal of the paint isnt an option.(also impossible) I want to render it. Can anyone suggest a way how, or perhaps any other idea, but i dont want painted bricks
Thanks in advanceHow do I to render a painted brick wall?
Couldn't you wrap it with the wire mesh they put on a house foundation before putting architectual stone up then put your plaster or lath on that?
Good luck!
Thanks in advanceHow do I to render a painted brick wall?
Couldn't you wrap it with the wire mesh they put on a house foundation before putting architectual stone up then put your plaster or lath on that?
Good luck!
Graphics cards. What's the difference between parallel rendering and dual rendering pipelines?
Would I want 4 parallel rendering pipelines or two dual rendering ones?Graphics cards. What's the difference between parallel rendering and dual rendering pipelines?
read all about it below - as to your 2nd question, it would help to know just what you are trying to do.
read all about it below - as to your 2nd question, it would help to know just what you are trying to do.
What was the legal argument that the Court used to render the Brown Decision?
I need some homework help. Here's the entire question:
During the 1950s, the United States Supreme Court, under the Brown Decision, ruled that schools should desegregate schools in the United States. What was the legal argument that the court use to render this ruling? Describe other instances of segregation that were commonplace as it relates to public facilities? Who was affected? Which group led the effort to end this practice? Was there any organized opposition to the action of the Supreme Court?What was the legal argument that the Court used to render the Brown Decision?
~ Legal argument was that segregation, even though under the Jim Crow laws it was supposed to be ';separate but equal';, was in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. The court ruled that just the fact that the schools had to be separate automatically violated the equal protection clause by way of discrimination, not to mention that the schools were far from equal.
~ Other commonplace segregation: public transportation, public restrooms, restaurants, and even the military
~ Affected: Victims were all blacks and other ';nonwhite'; races
~ NAACP was instrumental in ending this practice
~ Plenty of organized opposition to the court's action: In Virginia, Senator bird closed all the schools rather than have desegregated schools. In Arkansas, the governor called in the National Guard to keep black students out of white schools. In Alabama, George Wallace went to a college (I forget which one) and used his body to physically prevent black students in.
There's a start for you. Good luck!
During the 1950s, the United States Supreme Court, under the Brown Decision, ruled that schools should desegregate schools in the United States. What was the legal argument that the court use to render this ruling? Describe other instances of segregation that were commonplace as it relates to public facilities? Who was affected? Which group led the effort to end this practice? Was there any organized opposition to the action of the Supreme Court?What was the legal argument that the Court used to render the Brown Decision?
~ Legal argument was that segregation, even though under the Jim Crow laws it was supposed to be ';separate but equal';, was in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. The court ruled that just the fact that the schools had to be separate automatically violated the equal protection clause by way of discrimination, not to mention that the schools were far from equal.
~ Other commonplace segregation: public transportation, public restrooms, restaurants, and even the military
~ Affected: Victims were all blacks and other ';nonwhite'; races
~ NAACP was instrumental in ending this practice
~ Plenty of organized opposition to the court's action: In Virginia, Senator bird closed all the schools rather than have desegregated schools. In Arkansas, the governor called in the National Guard to keep black students out of white schools. In Alabama, George Wallace went to a college (I forget which one) and used his body to physically prevent black students in.
There's a start for you. Good luck!
What kind of hardware do studios use to develop and render graphics?
Do they use single processors like core i7 or quad cores or they use any specific hardware from any company or they make a computer farm?
Because I heard it took several days to render single frame of Transformers 2. Why would anything take so much time!!
Is it because they were rendering for a big screen?What kind of hardware do studios use to develop and render graphics?
what the..i can do that in photoshop with my gateway gt 5012 media center edition...
its not hard to render a picture =)What kind of hardware do studios use to develop and render graphics?
the answer to this question is simple. .
';it took several days to render single frame of Transformers 2';
Its a lie.. . a second contains 25, 29 or 30 frames. . if a single frame would took several days to be rendered, it is REALLY impossible...
ok, don't listen to Itachi... he doesn't know what he's talking about. The studios that make these feature film movies have render farms galore! units of multi processors. Floor to ceiling rack mounts of render nodes that I think now are up to 8 processors in every single rack space node. So you can imagine how many processors they are using to render these scenes out. The first Toy Story took 3 months to render because they didn't have the processing power they do today. I'm running my system on a Dual Quad core, which is 8 processors, and it still can take me a day or so to render out an animation, depending on how detailed I want to get.
So here's your answer: The reason a single frame of Transformers 2 took SO long to render, is first of all, I'm pretty sure it didn't take several days to render 1 frame... maybe a few hours with their systems. The Rendering software they use calculates every single shadow, and every single reflection. And remember there might be the same shadow showing in a reflection somewhere, so that one shadow now needs to be done twice. Nevermind the shadows and reflections... They don't take much time at all anymore. It's the Global Illumination, Indirect Illumination (light bouncing), Skylights, and the other thousands of lights they have set up in the scene emitting their own photons (a photon is a discrete bundle (or quantum) of electromagnetic (or light) energy. So picture having a red ball on a white surface and shining a light on that ball. You'll see some red bleed onto the white surface.
anyways, a LOT has to be calculated to render one image. OH, and don't forget the depth of field where objects in the forefront are clear, where the further objects are from the camera, they get blurry. AND the motion blur, that takes samples from previous renders to blur the animation when it moves. lol There is a lot. Just a lot.
(I need a faster computer now....) wanna buy me one?? =)
hope this answers your question, might have been confusing..... I'm just rambling. Laternumbering cortisone cream
Because I heard it took several days to render single frame of Transformers 2. Why would anything take so much time!!
Is it because they were rendering for a big screen?What kind of hardware do studios use to develop and render graphics?
what the..i can do that in photoshop with my gateway gt 5012 media center edition...
its not hard to render a picture =)What kind of hardware do studios use to develop and render graphics?
the answer to this question is simple. .
';it took several days to render single frame of Transformers 2';
Its a lie.. . a second contains 25, 29 or 30 frames. . if a single frame would took several days to be rendered, it is REALLY impossible...
ok, don't listen to Itachi... he doesn't know what he's talking about. The studios that make these feature film movies have render farms galore! units of multi processors. Floor to ceiling rack mounts of render nodes that I think now are up to 8 processors in every single rack space node. So you can imagine how many processors they are using to render these scenes out. The first Toy Story took 3 months to render because they didn't have the processing power they do today. I'm running my system on a Dual Quad core, which is 8 processors, and it still can take me a day or so to render out an animation, depending on how detailed I want to get.
So here's your answer: The reason a single frame of Transformers 2 took SO long to render, is first of all, I'm pretty sure it didn't take several days to render 1 frame... maybe a few hours with their systems. The Rendering software they use calculates every single shadow, and every single reflection. And remember there might be the same shadow showing in a reflection somewhere, so that one shadow now needs to be done twice. Nevermind the shadows and reflections... They don't take much time at all anymore. It's the Global Illumination, Indirect Illumination (light bouncing), Skylights, and the other thousands of lights they have set up in the scene emitting their own photons (a photon is a discrete bundle (or quantum) of electromagnetic (or light) energy. So picture having a red ball on a white surface and shining a light on that ball. You'll see some red bleed onto the white surface.
anyways, a LOT has to be calculated to render one image. OH, and don't forget the depth of field where objects in the forefront are clear, where the further objects are from the camera, they get blurry. AND the motion blur, that takes samples from previous renders to blur the animation when it moves. lol There is a lot. Just a lot.
(I need a faster computer now....) wanna buy me one?? =)
hope this answers your question, might have been confusing..... I'm just rambling. Later
How much does it cost to get a house rendered?
how much is it to pay a contractor to render the front of a standard size house?How much does it cost to get a house rendered?
You'll need to get some estimates from local contractors for the specific work you want done.
The Muse
You'll need to get some estimates from local contractors for the specific work you want done.
The Muse
Blender 3D: start rendering from a different point in animation?
Well, I have an animation that takes a long time to render. It made 34 pictures in about an hour to an hour and a half. I stopped it since I had to go, so now can I have it begin rendering again from the 35th frame of the animation?Blender 3D: start rendering from a different point in animation?
On the Button Window-%26gt; ANIM button Group
change the Start from 1 to 35 and let END be as is.
Now Start rendering.
My Blender 3D Art Samples
http://blender3d.patricia.googlepages.co鈥?/a>
http://kkrawal7.googlepages.com/index.ht鈥?/a>
http://blender3d.patricia.googlepages.co鈥?/a>
patricia_animation@hotmail.com
On the Button Window-%26gt; ANIM button Group
change the Start from 1 to 35 and let END be as is.
Now Start rendering.
My Blender 3D Art Samples
http://blender3d.patricia.googlepages.co鈥?/a>
http://kkrawal7.googlepages.com/index.ht鈥?/a>
http://blender3d.patricia.googlepages.co鈥?/a>
patricia_animation@hotmail.com
Is it a copyright infringment to do an artists rendering of someones photo and then sell the art work?
For example my friend did a painting of a photo of some parrots she saw once many years ago and now wants to sell it....are there any laws against that?Is it a copyright infringment to do an artists rendering of someones photo and then sell the art work?
Copyright Law of 1978 states all works of art are protected as soon as they are created. So as long as the photo use wasn't created by another artist claiming it's an original or you have permission, you're OK.
If you have questions go to this site: http://www.copyright.gov/Is it a copyright infringment to do an artists rendering of someones photo and then sell the art work?
No. Not unless she tries to convince people that her work IS the original, or is endorsed by the original. So long as no one can confuse her work for the original, she should be okay. This is why Andy Warhol was able to paint Soup Cans-- no one believed he was trying to sell soup!
There are laws but here in Canada the last time I checked the law stated that at least 10% of the original had to be changed in the copy.
As for what you are asking I would have to say that if the artist is commercializing the work with sales exceeding 1 copy then you could be in for a ';cease and desist'; order from the owner of the original work.
To copy out the piece verbatim so to speak and earn an income from the royalties of the sales then you could end up in the courts for your troubles.
However ...I've used parts of photographs from other visual artists for a painting and sold the work. I don't see any trouble for your friend in selling her version of the photos. It happens on a daily basis all over the world. In private sales and commisions it is quite legal and more than likely the original photographer would be pleased with it as you are not ripping him/her off with their artwork. You are simply selling a hand made rendition of the original photo on a one time basis.
Nothing illegal about that, nor immoral.
Tell your friend to go ahead and sell the painting, the '; nazi's of pettiness'; will not come down on him/her.
No its safe to sell, because the artwork was created by her hand. The photo was just a kick off point for the painting. Many famous photos though are copyrighted frinstance anything done by Disney is copyright material dont mess with them.
No there are no laws against it and here's why, there is no possible way on earth that she could have copied that photo exactly. copyright infringement in this case would mean that she has copied the photo via another photo and is selling the photos....Plagerism laws especially for a fine artist such as a painter or illustrator call for a change of at least 20% from the original that is being copied and unless your friend is an idiot savant and can actually match the colors perfrectly and the strokes of the bursh perfectly (if it were a painting being copied) then in that case, there may be some problem but I've never in 33 years heard of one case of plagerism simply because it's almost impossible to do,.....Now misrepresentation of an artist's work such as a Picasso being forged is soemthing that happens all the time and at various times throughout history people have sought to forge copies of certain paintings such as the Mona Lisa, or some Rembrandt or VAn Gogh........so you see, there is a difference.
Of course not. If taking someone's picture isn't a crime then why should drawing someone's picture be.
http://bestcartoonblog.blogspot.com/
as long as she doesn't claim it as the original piece, i think she's ok from any forgery stuff.
and as far as using someone else's art work in your own, it's fine under ';fair use'; laws. say if you paint a mustache on the copy of the mona lisa or paint campbell soup cans, you're making a statement using someone else's art.
for more on fair use, go here
(i would put the link to wikipedia's article on Fair Use here, but it's not letting me put in links, so i'll just say go to wikipedia and look it up yourself)
reading over this, i think your friend should be fine as the 4th part of the balancing test, ';the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work'; is in this case not worthwhile, as long as your friend doesn't crank out 100s of these.
Nope.
Think of it in the same way people have problems using the same name for their businesses. They only get into trouble if they are in the same market. I can call my bar Sotheby's but not my auction house.
If you sell art as art. One item and not plan to use it commercially in print there is no problem what so ever.
Even if you did problems would be very limited as paintings as a rule are original works even if they are derivatives.
Say the parrots were used in an advert for ... I don't know .. K-Mart and your painting would be used in a campaign for Sears ... you see the point? Well it still would not be you that is in trouble.
As a rule you are free to reproduce and sell (as original art) anything you can make.
Copyright laws are a very complex thing and any attempt to simplify the rules just makes things worse imo. Is it a copyright infringment in this situation? I would personally say no so long as it didnt look like it was copied from the photo, even if it was if its sold correctly and not published or replicated, then it's ';fair use'; imo. Nothing can stop anyone from claiming copyright infringment, but the courts will always ask the same questions when judgining if infringment took place .
Source(s):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4GLMgtaB鈥?/a>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ2W_3y7i鈥?/a>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bK8AZSYt鈥?/a> example of how disney's stuff is used to say somthing. This is allowed and not a copyright infringment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY-2YshuJ鈥?/a>
It depends on the photo you are hoping to use as a base, and if that photo is of an artwork or real life?
I sketched a facial portrait from a photo in a weekend paper liftout magazine. I wondered as well if this was copyright. I felt it was bad for not asking the permission of the actress, but with my current situation of pre undergrad BA I am not an artist skilled enough to ask the actress in person. Or with enough money to fly to wherever she is to meet with her in sitting!
I haven't displayed the sketch or even scanned it to my pc so it is only an original sketch and thus rendition of a mass produced and probably mass media syndicated photo - all with their legal and monetary above board.
Selling it as art is okay, but to sell it for commercial use would be an infringement.
It will only cause a problem if the selling of the painting takes money away from the business the photo was for. I think you will be fine if it is just one painting. Just don't make a bunch of prints and sell them.
Copyright Law of 1978 states all works of art are protected as soon as they are created. So as long as the photo use wasn't created by another artist claiming it's an original or you have permission, you're OK.
If you have questions go to this site: http://www.copyright.gov/Is it a copyright infringment to do an artists rendering of someones photo and then sell the art work?
No. Not unless she tries to convince people that her work IS the original, or is endorsed by the original. So long as no one can confuse her work for the original, she should be okay. This is why Andy Warhol was able to paint Soup Cans-- no one believed he was trying to sell soup!
There are laws but here in Canada the last time I checked the law stated that at least 10% of the original had to be changed in the copy.
As for what you are asking I would have to say that if the artist is commercializing the work with sales exceeding 1 copy then you could be in for a ';cease and desist'; order from the owner of the original work.
To copy out the piece verbatim so to speak and earn an income from the royalties of the sales then you could end up in the courts for your troubles.
However ...I've used parts of photographs from other visual artists for a painting and sold the work. I don't see any trouble for your friend in selling her version of the photos. It happens on a daily basis all over the world. In private sales and commisions it is quite legal and more than likely the original photographer would be pleased with it as you are not ripping him/her off with their artwork. You are simply selling a hand made rendition of the original photo on a one time basis.
Nothing illegal about that, nor immoral.
Tell your friend to go ahead and sell the painting, the '; nazi's of pettiness'; will not come down on him/her.
No its safe to sell, because the artwork was created by her hand. The photo was just a kick off point for the painting. Many famous photos though are copyrighted frinstance anything done by Disney is copyright material dont mess with them.
No there are no laws against it and here's why, there is no possible way on earth that she could have copied that photo exactly. copyright infringement in this case would mean that she has copied the photo via another photo and is selling the photos....Plagerism laws especially for a fine artist such as a painter or illustrator call for a change of at least 20% from the original that is being copied and unless your friend is an idiot savant and can actually match the colors perfrectly and the strokes of the bursh perfectly (if it were a painting being copied) then in that case, there may be some problem but I've never in 33 years heard of one case of plagerism simply because it's almost impossible to do,.....Now misrepresentation of an artist's work such as a Picasso being forged is soemthing that happens all the time and at various times throughout history people have sought to forge copies of certain paintings such as the Mona Lisa, or some Rembrandt or VAn Gogh........so you see, there is a difference.
Of course not. If taking someone's picture isn't a crime then why should drawing someone's picture be.
http://bestcartoonblog.blogspot.com/
as long as she doesn't claim it as the original piece, i think she's ok from any forgery stuff.
and as far as using someone else's art work in your own, it's fine under ';fair use'; laws. say if you paint a mustache on the copy of the mona lisa or paint campbell soup cans, you're making a statement using someone else's art.
for more on fair use, go here
(i would put the link to wikipedia's article on Fair Use here, but it's not letting me put in links, so i'll just say go to wikipedia and look it up yourself)
reading over this, i think your friend should be fine as the 4th part of the balancing test, ';the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work'; is in this case not worthwhile, as long as your friend doesn't crank out 100s of these.
Nope.
Think of it in the same way people have problems using the same name for their businesses. They only get into trouble if they are in the same market. I can call my bar Sotheby's but not my auction house.
If you sell art as art. One item and not plan to use it commercially in print there is no problem what so ever.
Even if you did problems would be very limited as paintings as a rule are original works even if they are derivatives.
Say the parrots were used in an advert for ... I don't know .. K-Mart and your painting would be used in a campaign for Sears ... you see the point? Well it still would not be you that is in trouble.
As a rule you are free to reproduce and sell (as original art) anything you can make.
Copyright laws are a very complex thing and any attempt to simplify the rules just makes things worse imo. Is it a copyright infringment in this situation? I would personally say no so long as it didnt look like it was copied from the photo, even if it was if its sold correctly and not published or replicated, then it's ';fair use'; imo. Nothing can stop anyone from claiming copyright infringment, but the courts will always ask the same questions when judgining if infringment took place .
Source(s):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4GLMgtaB鈥?/a>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ2W_3y7i鈥?/a>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bK8AZSYt鈥?/a> example of how disney's stuff is used to say somthing. This is allowed and not a copyright infringment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY-2YshuJ鈥?/a>
It depends on the photo you are hoping to use as a base, and if that photo is of an artwork or real life?
I sketched a facial portrait from a photo in a weekend paper liftout magazine. I wondered as well if this was copyright. I felt it was bad for not asking the permission of the actress, but with my current situation of pre undergrad BA I am not an artist skilled enough to ask the actress in person. Or with enough money to fly to wherever she is to meet with her in sitting!
I haven't displayed the sketch or even scanned it to my pc so it is only an original sketch and thus rendition of a mass produced and probably mass media syndicated photo - all with their legal and monetary above board.
Selling it as art is okay, but to sell it for commercial use would be an infringement.
It will only cause a problem if the selling of the painting takes money away from the business the photo was for. I think you will be fine if it is just one painting. Just don't make a bunch of prints and sell them.
What is the best way to render a visually stunning quotation on the computer?
I basically need to make a quotation look cool using formatting on the computer. I'm not a drawer, so unless it's really easy, like a heart, I will not be able to do it. I'm using a Mac, so all the apps (Word, Pages, Comic Life, Keynote, etc) are on here. Any advice? And it must be on a creative background.What is the best way to render a visually stunning quotation on the computer?
http://cooltext.com/
Might be a good starting point. I used it for posting bulletins %26amp; what not. It saves in .jpg format I believe.
http://cooltext.com/
Might be a good starting point. I used it for posting bulletins %26amp; what not. It saves in .jpg format I believe.
How to render black and white ink drawings?
I need to edit black and white ink drawings digitally. I do black and white ink cartoons by hand, but when I scan them you can see the texture of the white page and it makes it look blue/purple, but I want a high contrast (like, monochrome) look to it, without losing definition or detail, and without making it look pixelly. What can I do? Right now all I can think of is upping the brightness and contrast, but that sucks.How to render black and white ink drawings?
Professionals usually re-ink the drawings in the computer if their scanner sucks. You may be able to set the resolution higher and get better results (try like, 300 and see what happens) Also, sometimes there are settings in the scanning program that let you switch it to monochrome.
Professionals usually re-ink the drawings in the computer if their scanner sucks. You may be able to set the resolution higher and get better results (try like, 300 and see what happens) Also, sometimes there are settings in the scanning program that let you switch it to monochrome.
What household chemicals can be used to render a person unconscious?
I am doing an essay on what household chemicals can be used to render a person unconscious for anywhere between 30 minutes and a few hours.What household chemicals can be used to render a person unconscious?
Rendering someone unconscious can easily render them dead. That is why in anesthesia, where we are using carefully controlled and well-studied medications, we monitor patients' vital signs and spend a lot of our time with resuscitative efforts.
Using household chemicals for such an endeavor would be assault, attempted murder, or even homicide.What household chemicals can be used to render a person unconscious?
Carbon monoxide emitted from the oven or from your automobile engine can cause you unconscious particularly if you remain indoors or a garage.
Household chemicals are chemicals that are commonly found and used in and around the average household. Food additives generally don't fall under this category, unless they have a use other than for human consumption. In recent times there has been a move away from using household chemicals and towards Green cleaning. Examples:
* Bleach
* Ammonia
* Dr膩no
* Detergent
* Hard surface cleaner
Pesticides used in gardening or farm use may pose a threat to human health.
I always carry my Bottle of Chloroform on me XD
but seriously i think if you spray Mosquito Spray in someones Nose it will know them out or make them drowsy but its not healthy. = \
also use this site for homemade chloroform
http://www.sci-spot.com/chemistry/chloro鈥?/a>
No one believes that your doing an essaynumbering cortisone cream
Rendering someone unconscious can easily render them dead. That is why in anesthesia, where we are using carefully controlled and well-studied medications, we monitor patients' vital signs and spend a lot of our time with resuscitative efforts.
Using household chemicals for such an endeavor would be assault, attempted murder, or even homicide.What household chemicals can be used to render a person unconscious?
Carbon monoxide emitted from the oven or from your automobile engine can cause you unconscious particularly if you remain indoors or a garage.
Household chemicals are chemicals that are commonly found and used in and around the average household. Food additives generally don't fall under this category, unless they have a use other than for human consumption. In recent times there has been a move away from using household chemicals and towards Green cleaning. Examples:
* Bleach
* Ammonia
* Dr膩no
* Detergent
* Hard surface cleaner
Pesticides used in gardening or farm use may pose a threat to human health.
I always carry my Bottle of Chloroform on me XD
but seriously i think if you spray Mosquito Spray in someones Nose it will know them out or make them drowsy but its not healthy. = \
also use this site for homemade chloroform
http://www.sci-spot.com/chemistry/chloro鈥?/a>
No one believes that your doing an essay
What is offered as collateral for money rendered in divorce settlings?
I never understood what was met from the other side to compensate that money rendered in a divorce from alimony or prenups or what have you.What is offered as collateral for money rendered in divorce settlings?
Apparently women sitting around at home all day and having their life bankrolled is currently considered a sacrifice by the woman by divorce courts.What is offered as collateral for money rendered in divorce settlings?
My gosh! I can't make heads or tails of this one.
And I did try, but...
It's not your mother tongue, now is it?
Please answer 'yes' and all will be forgiven.
Apparently women sitting around at home all day and having their life bankrolled is currently considered a sacrifice by the woman by divorce courts.What is offered as collateral for money rendered in divorce settlings?
My gosh! I can't make heads or tails of this one.
And I did try, but...
It's not your mother tongue, now is it?
Please answer 'yes' and all will be forgiven.
What would feminists do if the economy rendered birth control pills unprofitable and the factories were idled?
Then I would probably die, since I actually need birth control pills for a health issue. Most people use the Pill for contraception, but others use it for other reasons, like minimizing the effects of periods, or regulating periods.
EDIT: I had to get a blood transfusion in 2002 because they were that bad. I was pale as hell, dizzy as hell and my blood count was extremely low.What would feminists do if the economy rendered birth control pills unprofitable and the factories were idled?
first, you talk as if birth control is a bad thing. Birth control is actually a very good thing, no one thinks that indiscriminate reproduction is a good idea. Second, the cost of producing birth control pills is so low that it is unlikely that they will ever become unprofitable. Third, birth control pills are often used to treat a wide variety of medical conditions, including osteoporosis which occurs primarily in postmenopausal women.What would feminists do if the economy rendered birth control pills unprofitable and the factories were idled?
Well, if there was no need (and so long as there's a substantial enough need, I imagine them remaining profitable), why would we be fighting for it?
But I doubt it would happen. There are so many women using birth control as hormone therapy (like myself) or to help with other things like PMS, PMDD, acne, etc., etc..
EDIT: Ah. Well, you were talking about it becoming unprofitable, not a problem in production.
Then people would just use condoms instead.
That would never be unprofitable. Not all people take birth control pills for the reason you assume. I have to take them becasue I have irregular menstrual periods. And with out them that could be life threatening. You need to do some research on birth control pills before you make generalized statements like that.
And yes, periods can kill if they are irregular.
Take over the factories? Protest and sign a petition? Fund research for homemade bc? Facilitate mass castration of men? idk....
We'd probably see a rise in alternative bc methods. Vasectomies, hysterectomies, and tubal ligations would be more common. Clinics might even offer sales. The abortion rate would definitely skyrocket, though. That, and the rate of mental illnesses.
Look at what happened in Romania during Nicolae Ceausescu's regime to get an idea of what could happen. All forms of birth control and abortions were banned. As a result, the orphanages began overflowing with unwanted children. Most of the children weren't actually orphans. Their parents couldn't afford to care for them or didn't want them so that's why they ended up in orphanages. Many had serious psychological effects of having been institutionalized so they could not bond with anyone, even when Americans began going over there in large numbers in the early 1990s to adopt them.
Well, I don't know what ';FEMINISTS'; would do, but the rest of us would find ourselves buried under a population explosion of monumental proportions - and in a world where overcrowding and critical shortages are ALREADY becoming a serious problem!
Since it would probably be the elements of society who are least prepared to handle unwanted children who would have the most of them, we would also be innundated with additional social problems, as all these unwanted and probably neglected (and in too many cases, mistreated and abused as well) kids begin to grow up. Since the birth rate would IMMEDIATELY skyrocket, we would see a new ';baby boom'; that would make the post WWII baby boom look insignificant by comparison.
The percentage of juvenile delinquency would climb out of control. If you think things are bad NOW - with kids having kids and kids killing kids - just imagine what kind of a destructive free-for-all we would see THEN! And as this new generation of unwanted children reached teenage and young adulthood, the surviving juvenile delinquents would become full-fledged adult criminals, and then THEY would start flooding the world with THEIR unwanted progeny, as well.
Wake up and LOOK at conditions in the world today in places where birth control is NOT available NOW! People are starving because there is not enough food. Sickness runs rampant. Overcrowding and massive poverty rule the day where working fathers cannot afford to feed and provide for their huge families, and the mother can't go to work and help out because she is stuck at home with her litter of kids. Even in large cities, the homeless population is more the rule than the exception.
(After a few generations of irresponsible, uncontrolled massive reproduction, homeless mothers would be seeing their kids starving to death on what used to be the main street in YOUR town!)
Beyond just your ';feminists'; - it would be an unqualified disaster for EVERYONE!
I don't think that will happen. I think if the economy worsens, people will be more eager to have birth control as they really, really, really won't be able to afford another child. The demand will go up; there would absolutely be profit in selling them still.
If there was a shortage, people would start making their own methods of contraception. Or there would be a bunch of women who were finally forced to learn about fertility instead of learning how to avoid pregnancy, and the rhythm method would become far more commonly used. It's possible to avoid pregnancy that way, although it's not fool proof and it isn't easy. lol
They won't.
I imagine their husbands and boyfriends might do and say the same things.
Umm, quick question? What exactly does birth control pills have to do with feminists? Seriously? I mean, birth control pills are just another prophylactic. Or did you mean the morning after pill? Now, I could see the tie in between feminists and the morning after pill. And no I don't think the morning after pill is bad, or that only feminists use it, etc. But really why are you just asking what feminists would do? I mean, what's the point? That's just making a generalization and everybody knows that generalizations are soo not the way to go if you're looking for good information.
Plus many women use birth control pills to control hemorrhaging while on their period, a very serious problem.
EDIT: I had to get a blood transfusion in 2002 because they were that bad. I was pale as hell, dizzy as hell and my blood count was extremely low.What would feminists do if the economy rendered birth control pills unprofitable and the factories were idled?
first, you talk as if birth control is a bad thing. Birth control is actually a very good thing, no one thinks that indiscriminate reproduction is a good idea. Second, the cost of producing birth control pills is so low that it is unlikely that they will ever become unprofitable. Third, birth control pills are often used to treat a wide variety of medical conditions, including osteoporosis which occurs primarily in postmenopausal women.What would feminists do if the economy rendered birth control pills unprofitable and the factories were idled?
Well, if there was no need (and so long as there's a substantial enough need, I imagine them remaining profitable), why would we be fighting for it?
But I doubt it would happen. There are so many women using birth control as hormone therapy (like myself) or to help with other things like PMS, PMDD, acne, etc., etc..
EDIT: Ah. Well, you were talking about it becoming unprofitable, not a problem in production.
Then people would just use condoms instead.
That would never be unprofitable. Not all people take birth control pills for the reason you assume. I have to take them becasue I have irregular menstrual periods. And with out them that could be life threatening. You need to do some research on birth control pills before you make generalized statements like that.
And yes, periods can kill if they are irregular.
Take over the factories? Protest and sign a petition? Fund research for homemade bc? Facilitate mass castration of men? idk....
We'd probably see a rise in alternative bc methods. Vasectomies, hysterectomies, and tubal ligations would be more common. Clinics might even offer sales. The abortion rate would definitely skyrocket, though. That, and the rate of mental illnesses.
Look at what happened in Romania during Nicolae Ceausescu's regime to get an idea of what could happen. All forms of birth control and abortions were banned. As a result, the orphanages began overflowing with unwanted children. Most of the children weren't actually orphans. Their parents couldn't afford to care for them or didn't want them so that's why they ended up in orphanages. Many had serious psychological effects of having been institutionalized so they could not bond with anyone, even when Americans began going over there in large numbers in the early 1990s to adopt them.
Well, I don't know what ';FEMINISTS'; would do, but the rest of us would find ourselves buried under a population explosion of monumental proportions - and in a world where overcrowding and critical shortages are ALREADY becoming a serious problem!
Since it would probably be the elements of society who are least prepared to handle unwanted children who would have the most of them, we would also be innundated with additional social problems, as all these unwanted and probably neglected (and in too many cases, mistreated and abused as well) kids begin to grow up. Since the birth rate would IMMEDIATELY skyrocket, we would see a new ';baby boom'; that would make the post WWII baby boom look insignificant by comparison.
The percentage of juvenile delinquency would climb out of control. If you think things are bad NOW - with kids having kids and kids killing kids - just imagine what kind of a destructive free-for-all we would see THEN! And as this new generation of unwanted children reached teenage and young adulthood, the surviving juvenile delinquents would become full-fledged adult criminals, and then THEY would start flooding the world with THEIR unwanted progeny, as well.
Wake up and LOOK at conditions in the world today in places where birth control is NOT available NOW! People are starving because there is not enough food. Sickness runs rampant. Overcrowding and massive poverty rule the day where working fathers cannot afford to feed and provide for their huge families, and the mother can't go to work and help out because she is stuck at home with her litter of kids. Even in large cities, the homeless population is more the rule than the exception.
(After a few generations of irresponsible, uncontrolled massive reproduction, homeless mothers would be seeing their kids starving to death on what used to be the main street in YOUR town!)
Beyond just your ';feminists'; - it would be an unqualified disaster for EVERYONE!
I don't think that will happen. I think if the economy worsens, people will be more eager to have birth control as they really, really, really won't be able to afford another child. The demand will go up; there would absolutely be profit in selling them still.
If there was a shortage, people would start making their own methods of contraception. Or there would be a bunch of women who were finally forced to learn about fertility instead of learning how to avoid pregnancy, and the rhythm method would become far more commonly used. It's possible to avoid pregnancy that way, although it's not fool proof and it isn't easy. lol
They won't.
I imagine their husbands and boyfriends might do and say the same things.
Umm, quick question? What exactly does birth control pills have to do with feminists? Seriously? I mean, birth control pills are just another prophylactic. Or did you mean the morning after pill? Now, I could see the tie in between feminists and the morning after pill. And no I don't think the morning after pill is bad, or that only feminists use it, etc. But really why are you just asking what feminists would do? I mean, what's the point? That's just making a generalization and everybody knows that generalizations are soo not the way to go if you're looking for good information.
Plus many women use birth control pills to control hemorrhaging while on their period, a very serious problem.
What are the benefits of rendering directly from a 3D render server system?
Hi, I am doing some school work and I cam by this question:
What are the benefits of rendering directly from a 3D render server system?
Can someone help me with this question please? Thank youWhat are the benefits of rendering directly from a 3D render server system?
You mean rendering from the system? the benefits are you computer won't do a tough job, you can do anything else without worrying about the resources of your computer and if the server has a good specification then it could render more faster.What are the benefits of rendering directly from a 3D render server system?
Hi, i am looking for the same answer. i 'd like to know what are the benefits of using a 3d render server when compared to 3d render farm???
What are the benefits of rendering directly from a 3D render server system?
Can someone help me with this question please? Thank youWhat are the benefits of rendering directly from a 3D render server system?
You mean rendering from the system? the benefits are you computer won't do a tough job, you can do anything else without worrying about the resources of your computer and if the server has a good specification then it could render more faster.What are the benefits of rendering directly from a 3D render server system?
Hi, i am looking for the same answer. i 'd like to know what are the benefits of using a 3d render server when compared to 3d render farm???
Any suggestions to achieve our goals RENDERING ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE CARE WITHIN THE REACH OF RURAL MASSES?
U MAY KINDLY VISIT OUR SITE WWW.SAIOAM.COM and offer suggestions to achieve our goals for the benefit of rural masses all over the world.Any suggestions to achieve our goals RENDERING ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE CARE WITHIN THE REACH OF RURAL MASSES?
Take assistance from the mahila self help groups. Teach people habits leading to good health. Medicine is the next only step whether alternative or otherwise. Prevention is better. Human excreta problem (Hagandari Mukata Gav) should be solved at once.Any suggestions to achieve our goals RENDERING ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE CARE WITHIN THE REACH OF RURAL MASSES?
Yog is the answer. What else?
Boredom has been defined by Fisher in terms of its central psychological processes: 鈥渁n unpleasant, transient affective state in which the individual feels a pervasive lack of interest in and difficulty concentrating on the current activity.鈥漑3] M. R. Leary and others define boredom similarly, and somewhat more succinctly, as 鈥渁n affective experience associated with cognitive attentional processes.鈥漑4] These definitions make it clear that boredom arises not from a lack of things to do but from the inability to latch onto any specific activity. Nothing engages us, despite an often profound desire for engagement.
There appear to be three general types of boredom, all of which involve problems of engagement of attention. These include times when we are prevented from engaging in something, when we are forced to engage in some unwanted activity, or when we are simply unable, for no apparent reason, to maintain engagement in any activity or spectacle.[5]
speak with the wealthy and worldvision..
Take assistance from the mahila self help groups. Teach people habits leading to good health. Medicine is the next only step whether alternative or otherwise. Prevention is better. Human excreta problem (Hagandari Mukata Gav) should be solved at once.Any suggestions to achieve our goals RENDERING ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE CARE WITHIN THE REACH OF RURAL MASSES?
Yog is the answer. What else?
Boredom has been defined by Fisher in terms of its central psychological processes: 鈥渁n unpleasant, transient affective state in which the individual feels a pervasive lack of interest in and difficulty concentrating on the current activity.鈥漑3] M. R. Leary and others define boredom similarly, and somewhat more succinctly, as 鈥渁n affective experience associated with cognitive attentional processes.鈥漑4] These definitions make it clear that boredom arises not from a lack of things to do but from the inability to latch onto any specific activity. Nothing engages us, despite an often profound desire for engagement.
There appear to be three general types of boredom, all of which involve problems of engagement of attention. These include times when we are prevented from engaging in something, when we are forced to engage in some unwanted activity, or when we are simply unable, for no apparent reason, to maintain engagement in any activity or spectacle.[5]
speak with the wealthy and worldvision..
What technical development during the 1960s rendered cast metal type obsolete?
This is a question for people who are familiar with Graphic Design. If you haven't been to college yet, don't bother responding. Thanks.What technical development during the 1960s rendered cast metal type obsolete?
It was the introduction of phototypesetting machines which made metal type obsolete. The earlier process of creating an entire finished page of metal simply to be photographed wasted considerable time and material. In the mid-twentieth century, new photographic and computer technology was used to create a method of setting type directly onto photographic plates, thus bypassing the metal casting stage entirely. Such systems of typesetting are called phototypesetting, or photocomposition.
It was the introduction of phototypesetting machines which made metal type obsolete. The earlier process of creating an entire finished page of metal simply to be photographed wasted considerable time and material. In the mid-twentieth century, new photographic and computer technology was used to create a method of setting type directly onto photographic plates, thus bypassing the metal casting stage entirely. Such systems of typesetting are called phototypesetting, or photocomposition.
What is the best way to render a visually stunning quotation on the computer?
I basically need to make a quotation look cool using formatting on the computer. I'm not a drawer, so unless it's really easy, like a heart, I will not be able to do it. I'm using a Mac, so all the apps (Word, Pages, Comic Life, Keynote, etc) are on here. Any advice?What is the best way to render a visually stunning quotation on the computer?
google a good backroundnumbering cortisone cream
google a good backround
Is it true that the frames per second that TVs run at renders the brain to susceptible suggestion?
Or is it just the Garbage that spin doctors feed us on the news and in big movies?Is it true that the frames per second that TVs run at renders the brain to susceptible suggestion?
Scientific studies do show that the brain does capture images displayed in some subliminal advertising. And it is also a function of the frame rate per second and the number of frames that the subliminal image is programmed to appear.
As to whether such capture in some part of the brain actually results in a change on the person's opinions, feelings or behavior is another issue. Success and failure has been shown in the various studies on this. So it is not all garbage or pop psychology. There is an element of truth to subliminal programming in film and video.Is it true that the frames per second that TVs run at renders the brain to susceptible suggestion?
Yes and it is supposed to work quite well.
The BBC have 'vote labour' messages sublimely broadcast, whereas Chanel 4 have 'Get your t*its out' broadcast on theirs.
yes, also the use of key words darren brown is the dogs when it comes to all that
It's just the garbage
Scientific studies do show that the brain does capture images displayed in some subliminal advertising. And it is also a function of the frame rate per second and the number of frames that the subliminal image is programmed to appear.
As to whether such capture in some part of the brain actually results in a change on the person's opinions, feelings or behavior is another issue. Success and failure has been shown in the various studies on this. So it is not all garbage or pop psychology. There is an element of truth to subliminal programming in film and video.Is it true that the frames per second that TVs run at renders the brain to susceptible suggestion?
Yes and it is supposed to work quite well.
The BBC have 'vote labour' messages sublimely broadcast, whereas Chanel 4 have 'Get your t*its out' broadcast on theirs.
yes, also the use of key words darren brown is the dogs when it comes to all that
It's just the garbage
What is the best way to render a visually stunning quotation on the computer?
I basically need to make a quotation look cool using formatting on the computer. I'm not a drawer, so unless it's really easy, like a heart, I will not be able to do it. I'm using a Mac, so all the apps (Word, Pages, Comic Life, Keynote, etc) are on here. Any advice?What is the best way to render a visually stunning quotation on the computer?
google a good backround
google a good backround
What volume should i mix and render my home recorded song at?
Thanks in advanced for all answers. I've just finished recording and mixing my bands new song and although it's mixed i know that once i've rendered it it will not be a similar volume to other artist's music on my ipod for example. Although this may be a vague question can anyone tell me what volume my song should be rendered at to match that of other artists. Thanks, jackWhat volume should i mix and render my home recorded song at?
If you have a sound editor (such as ProTools or Sound Forge), you can compare the volume levels of your existing tunes with the ones you recorded. It may be a little tricky if you did not use any compression or processing to temper your recording, especially if you have a wide spectrum of dynamics in your original material, but you can get it pretty close.
If you have a sound editor (such as ProTools or Sound Forge), you can compare the volume levels of your existing tunes with the ones you recorded. It may be a little tricky if you did not use any compression or processing to temper your recording, especially if you have a wide spectrum of dynamics in your original material, but you can get it pretty close.
What if I paint without rendering the wall?
I am planning to have a garden office with thrmo blocks. Both sides has approx 100mm gap against garden walls and will not be able to render as not enough space to get in. Would that cause any problem
if the front and back walls are rendered and leave side wall with just painting (waterproof masonary )?What if I paint without rendering the wall?
must be in the UK,
rendering in the USA means taking something out like rendering the fat out of pork
also most of us use feet and inches not mm .
please restate the ? with more detail using feet and inches
like how big is the Opening ? [door way]What if I paint without rendering the wall?
I have no idea what you are trying to describe here......????
Thermolites are very porous, so you may have damp problems if you do not render all walls. Masonary paint would only be a short term fix, and the wall would need re-painting after 5-10 years which will prove difficult with only a 100m gap.
if the front and back walls are rendered and leave side wall with just painting (waterproof masonary )?What if I paint without rendering the wall?
must be in the UK,
rendering in the USA means taking something out like rendering the fat out of pork
also most of us use feet and inches not mm .
please restate the ? with more detail using feet and inches
like how big is the Opening ? [door way]What if I paint without rendering the wall?
I have no idea what you are trying to describe here......????
Thermolites are very porous, so you may have damp problems if you do not render all walls. Masonary paint would only be a short term fix, and the wall would need re-painting after 5-10 years which will prove difficult with only a 100m gap.
Will RAM memory help make poser renders quicker?
yes,a good balance of cpu(processor) and graphic card also will helpWill RAM memory help make poser renders quicker?
yes
sure
yes
sure
How do i render in Sony Vegas to get a smaller file size for youtube upload?
I am trying to render a 15 second video in Sony Vegas 8.0. When i render it, the vodeo is fine. When i upload it to youtube then it takes 3 hours! Anyone know of any render settings to get a smaller file size?
Thanks.How do i render in Sony Vegas to get a smaller file size for youtube upload?
first, your video dimensions should be something like
640 x 360 (widescreen)
or
720 x 1200 (HD)
then, you render as a WMV file.
when it is done rendering, upload that file to youtube =)How do i render in Sony Vegas to get a smaller file size for youtube upload?
render it as mpeg, it will be bigger but will upload faster to youtube because this is what youtube converts it to because mpeg is more compatible
download total video converter then convert the less space taked format in this u can decrease the size of video.numbering cortisone cream
Thanks.How do i render in Sony Vegas to get a smaller file size for youtube upload?
first, your video dimensions should be something like
640 x 360 (widescreen)
or
720 x 1200 (HD)
then, you render as a WMV file.
when it is done rendering, upload that file to youtube =)How do i render in Sony Vegas to get a smaller file size for youtube upload?
render it as mpeg, it will be bigger but will upload faster to youtube because this is what youtube converts it to because mpeg is more compatible
download total video converter then convert the less space taked format in this u can decrease the size of video.
How do you render a video for youtube in widescreen but with out being HD?
I have sony vegas 9 pro, and rendering a video in HD takes so long on my computer, but really like having my youtube videos in widescreen. Is there a way to do this with out having it as HD?How do you render a video for youtube in widescreen but with out being HD?
Use Windows Movie Maker. They don't even support HD formats.
Use Windows Movie Maker. They don't even support HD formats.
Stating on an instrument that it is ';as per contract'; renders it nonnegotiable.?
True or FalseStating on an instrument that it is ';as per contract'; renders it nonnegotiable.?
That completely depends on two things.
1) Does the instrument perform the way the contract stated it was supposed to?
2) Who does the contract say gets to determine if the instrument meets those terms?
That completely depends on two things.
1) Does the instrument perform the way the contract stated it was supposed to?
2) Who does the contract say gets to determine if the instrument meets those terms?
How long before man renders the earth inhabitable?
It's inhabitable right now - we all live here perfectly okay! Where do you live then, if you can't live on earth?How long before man renders the earth inhabitable?
To answer that precisely, you would have to know everything that factors into the answer and that's impossible. But let me ask you these questions: when is the last time you seen a field of butterflies, food without pesticides, meat without hormones, water that isn't polluted, a worldwide push to stop all air pollution, worldwide banning of nuclear weapons, or anyone caring about how the next generation will deal with all of this?How long before man renders the earth inhabitable?
i am not a holly roller by no means,but i do believe in god .our allotted time is in his hands.however,mother nature and father time will restore this planet to her original glory,with or w/out man.enjoy this way of life while you can we are on the verge of fulfilling our destiny.GTP
10,000 years.
Depends on how soon you can get your hands on an East Indian and snuff em. At the moment, India is the only country that has little or no control over its population boom and the only nation with the highest birth to death rate ratio. Indians reproduce faster in India than the average rodent during a bamboo flowering cycle. More population means a faster drain on earth's natural resources. East Indians are everywhere, next only to the Chinese. The solution is if you find a turbaned driver in downtown New York you can safely assume he's a fresh immigrant and snuff him out. Hee Hee just kiddin !!!
Since 1948, the population in the world has grown from 1.5 billion to a whoping 6.5 billion. So in 58 years we have exploded fourfold. Something will have to give soon.
Not long.
I would say very soon, if we all don't start opening our eyes.
I give it about another 40 to 60 years
I think you over rate mans ability to effect the earth!
mother nature can and does more damage in a few minutes than man has caused in 20,000 years!
Never ! if man can not live on top of the planet then he will live beneath the planet .
I don't think anyone can answer that question. I think it's about inhabitable now. Just look around, read what's happening to the whole world ecologically. People continue to poison our air, our water, and the foods we eat. We continue to pollute the environment, as if we don't have a care in the world. People need to wake up and open their eyes. Make a lot of changes. If it's not already too late.
To answer that precisely, you would have to know everything that factors into the answer and that's impossible. But let me ask you these questions: when is the last time you seen a field of butterflies, food without pesticides, meat without hormones, water that isn't polluted, a worldwide push to stop all air pollution, worldwide banning of nuclear weapons, or anyone caring about how the next generation will deal with all of this?How long before man renders the earth inhabitable?
i am not a holly roller by no means,but i do believe in god .our allotted time is in his hands.however,mother nature and father time will restore this planet to her original glory,with or w/out man.enjoy this way of life while you can we are on the verge of fulfilling our destiny.GTP
10,000 years.
Depends on how soon you can get your hands on an East Indian and snuff em. At the moment, India is the only country that has little or no control over its population boom and the only nation with the highest birth to death rate ratio. Indians reproduce faster in India than the average rodent during a bamboo flowering cycle. More population means a faster drain on earth's natural resources. East Indians are everywhere, next only to the Chinese. The solution is if you find a turbaned driver in downtown New York you can safely assume he's a fresh immigrant and snuff him out. Hee Hee just kiddin !!!
Since 1948, the population in the world has grown from 1.5 billion to a whoping 6.5 billion. So in 58 years we have exploded fourfold. Something will have to give soon.
Not long.
I would say very soon, if we all don't start opening our eyes.
I give it about another 40 to 60 years
I think you over rate mans ability to effect the earth!
mother nature can and does more damage in a few minutes than man has caused in 20,000 years!
Never ! if man can not live on top of the planet then he will live beneath the planet .
I don't think anyone can answer that question. I think it's about inhabitable now. Just look around, read what's happening to the whole world ecologically. People continue to poison our air, our water, and the foods we eat. We continue to pollute the environment, as if we don't have a care in the world. People need to wake up and open their eyes. Make a lot of changes. If it's not already too late.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)